| Previous · Next | |
| User | Message |
|
colink
|
Date: 11/24/2007 11:32 pm · Subject: WebGUI testing, 11/27/2007 · Rating: 9
It's been a slow, but good week for testing. We have 141 test files, all but four are passing. Two are failing due to problems with Graphics::Magick (Macro/Thumbnail.t and Storage/Image.t) The i18n/label.t test continues to fail, and will until it gets rewritten. I've started to look into Perl::Critic as a framework to make a more robust parser. Spectre/Workflow.t is failing because it requires access to a WRE config for one of its subtests. This will either require a change to the nightly test setup, or to add a conditional SKIP to the file. Since not everyone runs the WRE (fools that we are), I'll probably add the SKIP. I ran a full test coverage suite on Friday. The full results are over 3 Mb compressed, so I won't post them here. If you'd like to see them, please email me privately and I'll email them to you. I will attach the summary page so that y'all can see where we stand, and where we need help. Remember that even if you write just one test in the next week, we can still make a huge difference in WebGUI's stability and coverage through our collective work. If you want to contribute but don't know where to start, please post back or see me on IRC. Attached Files |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
knowmad
|
Date: 11/26/2007 11:05 am · Subject: Re: WebGUI testing, 11/27/2007 · Rating: 14
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:32:23PM -0600, ckuskie@sterlink.net wrote:> I ran a full test coverage suite on Friday. The full results are over > 3 Mb compressed, so I won't post them here. If you'd like to see > them, please email me privately and I'll email them to you. I will > attach the summary page so that y'all can see where we stand! , and > where we need help. Hi Colin, Nice work on the test suite. I submitted an RFE[1] to get the Devel::Cover running for smoke tests. JT says this was done on 10/25 but that it was being tested. Do you know anything about this? William [1] http://www.webgui.org/rfe/request-for-enhancement/add-develcover-output-for-smoke-tests -- Knowmad Technologies - Web Site Development & Automation W: http://www.knowmad.com | E: william@knowmad.com P: 704.343.9330 | http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/williammckee |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
JT
|
Date: 11/26/2007 11:19 am · Subject: Re: WebGUI testing, 11/27/2007 · Rating: 0
They are running with testCodebase.pl --coverage. If that's not what you want, then be more specific.
|
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
colink
|
Date: 11/26/2007 11:31 am · Subject: Re: WebGUI testing, 11/27/2007 · Rating: 6
Looks like testCodebase.pl needs some more work to run "cover" after the test run to generate the HTML report. Then we'll need some way to point to, or zip up the coverage report so that it can be included with the smoke test data. Or, maybe we could do it in the script that invokes testCodebase.pl, takes the STDOUT and posts it to the Smoke Test board? |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|