| Previous · Next | |
| User | Message |
|
martien
|
Date: 1/2/2012 4:14 pm · Subject: WebGUI 8 is ready, WRE 8 not so much · Rating: -3
As I already wrote a few months ago: nice to hear! I certainly will give it a try, also without WRE (since I'm already using a WRE-version, depending on native system packages) However, as actual at that time, there still remain the answers to the points beneath. I'm wondering, why I didn't get even one reaction to the corresponding post. Using 7.10 today, apart from the W8-TODO-list on this site and remembering the 5-7 change, which made a lot of people stop developing WG-sites, I should like to be informed about the some things like:
Some clear statements and/or advices about using W8 would help very much to prevent unnecessary trouble. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
perlDreamer
|
Date: 1/2/2012 4:29 pm · Subject: Re: WebGUI 8 is ready, WRE 8 not so much · Rating: -5
To be clear, my response to your earlier post was to take advantage of the existing documentation in this forum, in the tracker, in IRC conversations, and from various blogs. However, either that was too arduous to go and find, or it isn't clear enough for you. Over the next several days, I will be answering your questions, one by one on the blog. This time will have to come out my WebGUI/WRE 8 development time, so this will continue to delay the release. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
martien
|
Date: 1/5/2012 10:20 am · Subject: Re: WebGUI 8 is ready, WRE 8 not so much · Rating: -1
To be clear, there was no response at all.
I saw and appreciate that very well. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
perlDreamer
|
Date: 1/5/2012 2:58 pm · Subject: Re: WebGUI 8 is ready, WRE 8 not so much · Rating: -3
You are exactly right. I was remembering a response to a post made after yours in a different thread in the developer's forum. My apologies. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
