| Previous · Next | |
| User | Message |
|
frodwith
|
Date: 8/18/2010 5:46 pm · Subject: PSGI wobjects · Rating: 0
When I heard Doug's idea for the dispatch() api, I immediately went"Ah ha! Time for a PSGI wobject!". So, here's two implementations (head contains the second one, its parent commit contains the first). http://github.com/frodwith/webgui/tree/psgi-wobject The first was rejected by Doug cause it's a security hole (still sort of neat, though). The second one makes for a little more work per PSGI application, but doesn't let admins execute arbitrary perl code *halo*. Questions? Comments? Scathing personal attacks? |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
preaction
|
Date: 8/18/2010 6:32 pm · Subject: Re: PSGI wobjects · Rating: 0
I like it, the typical use-case being a reusable PSGI app that, with a couple minor incantations, can be tossed around in the asset system like a proper asset. Or even a single PSGI app with multiple URLs in WebGUI (if it doesn't differentiate itself based on its root URL). Or even a single PSGI app in WebGUI 7.9 (WebGUI 8 is a Plack app, so you can add PSGI apps in an easier way to 8) |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
