| Previous · Next | |
| User | Message |
|
Trex
|
Date: 8/5/2009 9:57 am · Subject: New Site navigation · Rating: 1
I wanted to comment on the "difficult to use" topic in the recent "Jquery" thread, but since I'm not touching on Jquery itself, I thought it might be good to start a new thread on this topic. In terms of usability of the new site, please allow me to point out a few personal observations: |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
susanb
|
Date: 8/5/2009 10:29 am · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
I posted a bug regarding the wiki issue some time ago at http://www.webgui.org/use/bugs/tracker/10585 . Your suggestion of a "search all wikis" field would definitely help. If you want to submit RFEs for this, I'd be happy to donate karma. Susan B |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
knowmad
|
Date: 8/5/2009 12:49 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
Trex, Thanks for taking the time to document what I believe are issues that many webgui.org users are finding. I concur with your comments & suggestions. I've posted karma to the RFE that Susan referenced and would be happy to add further karma to the other usability issues that you've brought up. I rely on email subscription for reading the forums and hardly use the wiki these days due to the inability to find information that used to be easily contained in one place. I wonder if Plain Black has seen a change in usage of the forums or wikis since launching the new format.
William ---- |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
JT
|
Date: 8/5/2009 1:50 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
This is not really the appropriate list for this discussion, or perhaps all the forums are the appropriate one. But since it was brought up here, I guess we'll leave it here. We're talking about it internally, but I'd also like to hear about any ideas you guys have as well. Personally I thought that the old site's navigation was absolutely perfect. You could get pretty much anywhere in one click. But there were constant complaints from people saying that it was bad, wrong, uninviting, couldn't find anything, not how it should be done, etc. In fact, I even got into a fairly heated discussion about it at the WUC last year with Koen and some others. To be honest, that's how it's been since day one. No matter how we design the site and navigation, people complain about how it's organized. I'm unwilling to debate aesthetics. Honestly I could care less if one person hates this design or that because aesthetics are a very personal matter. I liked the way the old site looked, I like the way this one looks, and I probably would like it if someone else came up with a new design. Who cares what I like? It's not about me or you or any one person. We ran a poll on the aesthetics of the site and the vast majority said they liked it. That's good enough for me. However, I do very much care whether people can find the information they are looking for. At the WUC last year Koen and others made it very clear that the WebGUI.org site should be divided up by subject matter. Perhaps I/we took that a bit too far in that we divided up the wiki and forums by subject matter as well (and planned to do the Bazaar and WebGUI.tv too). And we have in production right now (not launched) a community dashboard which will replace the front page when you are logged in which would allow you to get the forums and latest wiki entries etc from the sections you care about. I also know that I've talked to several people in the community, and at least one person on my own staff who thinks that the new site is much better to navigate than the old site. I also know we showed off the new site design and navigation to everyone for several months before we unleashed it on the site. We got pretty much all positive comments. However, seeing screen shots and actually having to use the thing are certainly two different things. Finally, while we discuss this try to frame the discussion away from you hate it because you don't like change. Change happens, get over it. Please argue about the merits of how you'd go about finding things. And also keep in mind, that the site ultimately must be navigable by people who have never seen it before. So with that, I leave it to you, our community. Tell us what you think needs to be done and we'll do our best to assimilate that and throw a plan back at you. Then we can put up a poll about it and put it to a vote. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
koen
|
Date: 8/5/2009 3:51 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 1
However, I do very much care whether people can find the information they are looking for. At the WUC last year Koen and others made it very clear that the WebGUI.org site should be divided up by subject matter.
Indeed so, for the first time user that is much clearer. And I do think the new way of organising the site is much, much better now.
Perhaps I/we took that a bit too far in that we divided up the wiki and forums by subject matter as well (and planned to do the Bazaar and WebGUI.tv too).
I have not thought that for one moment. It has been split up in a very clear and well defined way.
And we have in production right now (not launched) a community dashboard which will replace the front page when you are logged in which would allow you to get the forums and latest wiki entries etc from the sections you care about.
Fantastic! That could solve this rfe, and this rfe, and this rfe, and perhaps this rfe and even this rfe. What I'm trying to say here is that while the experience has improved for the new users, it still has to go a long way for the experienced and frequent users. I have just reread my initial comments to the 'what would you like in a new design thread. I must say, a lot of my comments have been taken into account. Thank you for that. My number one request:
What I would still like (more) is:
And to a lesser extent:
Finally, while we discuss this try to frame the discussion away from you hate it because you don't like change. Change happens, get over it.
I like change, give me more of it!
Please argue about the merits of how you'd go about finding things. And also keep in mind, that the site ultimately must be navigable by people who have never seen it before. Indeed so. I think I have done so above. So with that, I leave it to you, our community. Tell us what you think needs to be done and we'll do our best to assimilate that and throw a plan back at you. Then we can put up a poll about it and put it to a vote.
That would be quite a lot of polls. I would just like to remind you that there are lies, damn lies and statistics. Koen de Jonge - ProcoliX |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
knowmad
|
Date: 8/5/2009 2:09 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
JT, Thanks for the thoughtful response to a sticky subject. I think what we're discussing is usability, not aesthetics. We're not a usability company but perhaps there are some members in the commuity who could provide ways for the community to do a usability study of the site. As for suggestions, I think Trex hit the high spots for me. Looking forward to more discussion around this topic as it affects not just the webgui.org site but all sites being developed in WebGUI.
William ---- |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
JT
|
Date: 8/5/2009 7:10 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
> As for suggestions, I think Trex hit the high spots for me. Looking > forward to more discussion around this topic as it affects not just > the webgui.org site but all sites being developed in WebGUI. > How could the organization of the navigation on webgui.org affect all WebGUI sites being developed. That doesn't make much sense to me. Could you explain further? |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
knowmad
|
Date: 9/16/2009 1:24 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
JT, It's been awhile since I wrote that response and upon reflection think I may have been flourishing a bit. Nonetheless, I think the navigation of webgui.org comes down to a usability issue. As such, it impacts sites being developed in WebGUI as it sets an example and tone of how to structure navigation. Your comments at the WUC that you're adding more ways to access the content was good to hear. It will be an example of how to overlay the two navigational themes that Trex laid out in his post on 8/8 -- navigation by function or by usage. I know this is bringing up an old topic but it's still just as important and I wanted to point out that Plainblack is open to ways to improve webgui.org.
William ---- |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
Trex
|
Date: 8/7/2009 11:12 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
JT, I did consider moving this post to another forum, but since it was a continuation of another post in this forum, I wanted to keep it here so that people who read the JQuery post wouldn't miss it. Fortunately, my decision hasn't generated serious complaints and the post has generated some good discussion. It seems that the overall issue is the challenge of deciding on a hierarchy that best gets users to the information they need. It's something that we have long heated discussions over at the place I work every time a new site design gets started. You can divide the site structure and navigation into functional topics or user groups, but generally not both. For WebGUI.org, the previous site was organized first around what users might want to do on the website (discuss, document, download, etc.), and then within these categories you might find further content divisions based on what you want to do with WebGUI itself (design, develop, administer, etc.). With the new website, this approach is reversed, focusing first on what you want to do with WebGUI, and then dividing into the tools that help do that job. Putting myself in the position of someone just learning about WebGUI for the first time, I can see how the new navigation would be great for them. Or, for people who have a job that covers a specific subset of WebGUI (like template design), this navigation system is good at helping them focus on the topic of interest to them. However, for those of us who were used to the everything-in-one-place wiki, or who wear many hats on the job (I fall into both these categories), the new organization makes the site more challenging for us to use than the old one did. The fact that content is broken out into disconnected units means that you have to search in multiple places if you're not sure which category your question falls within. In fact, your question may span multiple categories, so it has no truly proper "home". If you're trying to look up information in this latter category, your options are to either run multiple searches or use the site-wide search. Neither of these options is very efficient (especially the site-wide search). If you know you're looking for something wiki-related or forum-related, it would be much handier to have the option to search all wikis/forums. So, at Susan B's suggestion, I've set up a RFE to which people can contribute karma, and I've seeded it with a bit of my own to start things off. Hopefully it will gain support, especially since I believe implementing the changes means simply utilizing capaiblities already present in WebGUI, and won't require any changes to the current navigation or structure. |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
|
knowmad
|
Date: 9/16/2009 1:00 pm · Subject: Re: New Site navigation · Rating: 0
Trex, Nice response. Can you provide a link to the RFE you added?
William ---- |
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|